There was a debate that was cancelled in May, later it was held indeed. I don’t think the piece alleged that Ayling himself triggered violence. On the Platform there were various interviews where left - leaning interviewees said the free speech shall not happen if that triggers violence. One of the interviewees indeed referred to violence happening on the “stop co-governance” events. However, when Sean Plunket went into details, the interviewee could not mention anything for which Batchelor might have been responsible.
Some very basic errors exist in this commentary. Ayling did participate in the panel; he wasn’t cancelled. Also, no one has ever alleged any form of him ‘triggering violence’, nor any collaboration with Batchelor.
There was a debate that was cancelled in May, later it was held indeed. I don’t think the piece alleged that Ayling himself triggered violence. On the Platform there were various interviews where left - leaning interviewees said the free speech shall not happen if that triggers violence. One of the interviewees indeed referred to violence happening on the “stop co-governance” events. However, when Sean Plunket went into details, the interviewee could not mention anything for which Batchelor might have been responsible.
Best wishes
Some very basic errors exist in this commentary. Ayling did participate in the panel; he wasn’t cancelled. Also, no one has ever alleged any form of him ‘triggering violence’, nor any collaboration with Batchelor.